Tag: Miami Heat

Why Lillard trade demand may signal a change in philosophy for NBA franchises

Business can be messy, and it might become even more so in the future

We all know the way the NBA works these days. More than any other league, the players are the ones who ultimately hold the power more often than not. It’s common to see stars sign long-term deals with their current teams, only to request a trade when a no-win situation stays that way a year later (or maybe in shorter time than that). So it probably shouldn’t be much of a surprise to hear point guard Damian Lillard wants to be traded away from the Portland Trail Blazers, with the Miami Heat being the preferred destination. We’ll get into the specifics of how we got here in a moment, but just remember it’s okay for multiple things to be true at the same time, even if society wants to dictate right or wrong.

Let’s start with the facts in this matter. In an era where players staying with the original team that drafted them has become a thing of the past, Lillard is the anomaly in the equation. The now 33-year-old guard out of Weber State has played all 11 of his professional seasons with the Trail Blazers, so it’s not like loyalty has been an issue. With that said, Portland has paid a pretty penny to keep him there. Lillard signed a two-year, $121.77 million extension (according to Spotrac) to stay in the Pacific Northwest until the end of the 2026-27 season. That’s almost a $61 million average over those two seasons, and that’s just the latest of the big money deals the Trail Blazers have given Lillard during his stay. Career earnings for the guard sits at almost $234 million, and that will almost double by the time the extension is done. People will do what they want with these facts, but there’s cases to be made for both sides in using them.

About those opinions, as is the case with just about anything these days, those are going in a variety of directions. On the Lillard side, they would say it’s about time he demanded a trade, and Portland owes it to him to send him where he wants to go. On the Trail Blazers end, the consensus is they need to do the best deal to benefit the team, not the player, and they have paid Lillard more than enough to reward the loyalty. The reality is Portland should do a deal that’s going to help them going forward, and if Lillard is going to demand leaving after signing deals, they don’t have any obligation to make him happy with where they trade him to. Lillard is also within his rights to demand going elsewhere, and with the NBA being one of the more player-driven leagues, it’s logical to think he’ll ultimately get what he wants. If winning is what Lillard is about, it’s no secret that wasn’t going to happen at a high level in Portland, and instead of getting to free agency, he chose to extend and stay. This isn’t an attempt to criticize him for his loyalty, it’s simply pointing out what a lot of people already figured, and if Lillard is going to have that much money paid to him, it’s hard to get players to build around him. Therefore, if he supposed to be that player many believe he is, Lillard should be able to elevate the Trail Blazers (or any team he’s on) to a championship level. We all know that hasn’t happened, and the trade request looks like an attempt to get out of a dire situation Lillard had a hand in creating, at least to some.

Now, the question is what happens from here. Most believe a trade to the Heat will be completed at some point, whether that becomes a three or four-team deal, or not. If and when that happens, one might wonder if this starts to change the way contracts are structured in the NBA. As it currently stands, the longest deals are four or five years, depending on a player deciding if he wants to stay with the team he previously played for. Are there more deals, particularly for star players, that are two-year deals with the option for the second season? Constantly, the masses are told it’s worth the investment to keep a star player as long as possible, but what’s the point if said player isn’t willing to stay for the duration of the deal, especially if things don’t go as planned? It’s a real question teams will seemingly have to ask themselves for the future. Every year is its own story, and there aren’t many teams that stay exactly the same from the year prior. Times have evolved, and teams might not have much choice but to adjust with them.

It should never be a question about being honest, but if we’re in the business of doing so, Lillard is far from the first to want out after signing a long-term deal with a franchise. He’s just the latest in a lengthy line that includes Kevin Durant and James Harden (among others). Players should be able to get what they feel their value is worth, and be at a place where they know they would be happy. If they’re going to pursue that, sacrifice will be required, and it could come in the form of not having a good team capable of winning big around them. When things go haywire, trying to catch the first thing going out the door can’t be the answer. It should be as simple as playing out the contract, then make the decision to stay or go. Of course, it wouldn’t be right if it wasn’t more complicated than that, and such is life in the NBA. We’ll see how the Lillard saga plays out, but don’t be surprised if the grass isn’t greener on the other side for the longtime Trail Blazer.

With each passing day, narratives continue to get worse

Just when we think the highest level of buffoonery is reached, people are there to prove us wrong

In life, everyone has an opinion, and changes in narratives almost equal the amount of viewpoints. It’s all subjective who is believable or not, but no matter what side of the equation one is on, there’s no arguing with hard facts. Despite that, there are many who will try, due to the fear of having to admit they’re wrong about something. Therefore, it’s time to crush the garbage narratives that are (or was) out there about a few players, using the NBA Finals as the basis. Before we dive in, it’s keenly understood basketball is a team sport, and nobody can win championship or other awards by themselves. With that said, the culture is one that loves to look at what individuals are doing, especially when it comes to discussing anything best of. So because of said culture, let’s embrace instead of fight against, and do a deeper dive into the cesspool of word salad.

Let’s start with Denver Nuggets center Nikola Jokic, who just led the club to their first ever league title, and won the NBA Finals MVP in the process. Before this season, Jokic won the previous two regular season MVP awards, asserting his status as one of the best players in the world. It’s hard to please everybody, but the narratives that came Jokic’s way is comical and sad at the same time. We had people saying he was “stat-padding,” and the awards he won were due to some sort of a racial bias supporting international players. We even have many saying Jokic should not have won the MVPs because the Nuggets didn’t have much postseason success in those two seasons, despite the fact the playoffs have nothing to do with the voting. Objectively speaking, Jokic has been a great player for a while in the NBA, long before he was an MVP candidate. What happened this season is the casual fan (and the haters who support these claims) got to see the 28-year-old center do what he’s been doing on a national and worldwide spotlight. With an NBA title now under his belt, there isn’t much for people to hate on, and the ironic thing is Jokic didn’t win the regular season MVP award this year (that went to Philadelphia 76ers center Joel Embiid). To those people who said Jokic didn’t deserve those MVPs, does that mean Embiid doesn’t deserve his, since the 76ers blew a 3-2 lead in the Eastern Conference semifinals against the Boston Celtics? This isn’t intended to be a campaign for Jokic, but if we’re in the business of looking at things fairly, let’s do so. It’s understood that probably won’t happen, but Jokic has done more than enough to make the case.

Staying with Denver, let’s discuss the narrative surrounding Jokic’s teammate and potent sidekick, guard Jamal Murray. Before discussing Murray in detail, let’s remember what he had to endure to get back to playing at a superstar level. On April 12, 2021, Murray tore the ACL in his left knee, and missed the next two postseasons due to the injury. Even this season, there were worries about his durability going forward, with questions surrounding if he would be fully available for the Nuggets’ title run. As we now know, Murray was arguably the second best player in the playoffs behind the aforementioned Jokic. With that in mind, the narrative on what the 26-year-old did during Denver’s run being a surprise is beyond wild. When Murray is right, he’s one of the games best scoring threats. In the playoff bubble closing out the COVID-plagued 2020 season, he had two 50-point games and the same number of 40-point games. With Murray suffering the torn-ACL, the guess is many forgot how good he is capable of being, but if people are historians of basketball like they claim to be, the performance the guard put on shouldn’t be much of a surprise. It also verifies how good Denver is when they have their two stars playing together. The last time Murray was healthy for the playoffs (prior to this year), the Nuggets made it to the Western Conference Finals. The proof says he can play with anyone in the league, and put up big numbers doing it. For those who forgot, Murray properly reminded them.

For the final case of trash narratives, let’s go to Miami Heat forward Jimmy Butler. In general, the Heat are an interesting case. On one hand, Miami was the eighth and final seed in the East, barely getting into the dance after surviving the play-in tournament. They turned the birth into an improbable run to the NBA Finals before losing to Denver in five games. On the other hand, this is primarily the same squad that has advanced to at least the Eastern Conference Finals three of the last four seasons (twice making it to the NBA Finals). Knowing that bit of info might make one believe the Heat’s run shouldn’t be a shock, but it would be logical to think otherwise given how bad Miami looked at times. One thing that has been consistent is the play of Butler, and that reaches another level come playoff time. Bottom line, the Heat are nowhere close to this level without Butler’s leadership and energy, but losing brings criticism and narratives that weren’t even thought of the day before. Now, questions about being whether or not Butler can be the best player on a championship team are simmering. Remember when everyone was praising “Heat Culture?” Those praises have disappeared into the Rocky Mountain air. Taking the big picture view, it’s a minor miracle Butler and Miami have been as successful as they have been. They have never had the most talent, but it’s hard to match them in consistent effort and passion. Even still, people have to make up narratives to fill blocks on the debate shows that cover the airwaves.

Jokic, Murray and Butler are not the first people to find themselves in the narrative cesspool, and they definitely won’t be the last. No matter how hard someone may try to avoid them, opinions will be out there, left to be found in some way, shape or form. All of that is fine, but let’s at least be sensible and objective about the views. Nowadays, it’s easy to wonder if the ones who paint these narratives even believe what they’re saying, or is it all about selling hot takes in an attempt to maximize click bait. These three players don’t need me to have their backs at all, but it does feel good to call the BS out in their favor.

It’s time for the game show that’s taking over the sports world

These teams face many questions after getting eliminated from the NBA’s conference semifinals.

In sports, every team has stuff they have to address after a season of games. Some have more questions to answer than others, but the goal is to be in the best position to compete for a title in the next campaign. For teams in the NBA, there seems to be a point where those decisions hit a critical stage, and that’s if said team is eliminated from the playoffs after the conference semifinals. With that in mind, it’s time to play “Run It Back or Break It Up?,” the game where we decide whether the squad in question is better off keeping things together for another run, or blowing things up to start over. There are four teams who have major evaluations to conduct after being bounced out. As this game moves on, I’ll decide what I think should happen with the clubs going forward (your feedback is strongly encouraged as well). Without further or do, it’s time to introduce the contestants:

New York Knicks

If we are to listen to Knicks fans and a good amount of the media outlets in the northeast, they would have us believe the sky is falling with their team, and losing to the eighth-seeded Miami Heat in six games could certainly qualify for a disappointing finish. The reality is not many people had New York getting to this point in the first place, and until the team started to make moves in the regular season, they were seen as somewhat of a laughing stock. After signing point guard Jalen Brunson to a long-term contract last summer, large numbers of NBA followers (including myself) questioned why the Knicks would make such a move. Brunson would go on to give a resounding answer why he was brought to NYC, forcing some of those naysayers to call the acquisition the best signing of the year. In other words, there’s more reason to be optimistic than pessimistic in New York.

Having said that, there are hard choices for the Knicks to make if they want to continue the ascension. They found a gem in Brunson, but the rest of the roster has shown significant chunks of inconsistent play, particularly forwards Julius Randle and RJ Barrett. To answer the question, I believe they should run it back with a couple of caveats. Barrett caught a lot of criticism from the masses, and it was much deserved based on his poor shooting against the Heat. From my evaluation, he looked like a player who lost confidence, and the moments got the best of him. If there’s a next time at this stage, Barrett should be better prepared. The other caveat has to do with Randle, because there’s rumblings about trading the league’s Most Improved Player in 2021. That’s an option, but who would be the other trade partner? Of course, Portland Trail Blazers guard Damian Lillard has been mentioned as a potential target, but that wouldn’t come cheap. A trade for Lillard would probably gut the team of any depth they had before a potential deal, resulting in more heartache for the Knicks and their fans. All that considered, it’s probably best for New York to stay intact for now.

Decision: Run It Back

Philadelphia 76ers

Unlike the expectations for the Knicks, the 76ers were looked at as a team that could take the next step, with that being an appearance in the Eastern Conference Finals. Up until a few days ago, there was reason to believe that would happen. Philly had the newly-crowned MVP in center Joel Embiid, a former MVP in guard James Harden that showed signs of that form, and they had a 3-2 series lead over the defending Eastern Conference champion Boston Celtics with a closeout opportunity at home. That’s when disaster struck, as the 76ers collapsed in the fourth quarter of Game 6, and followed that up with a blowout loss in Game 7. The more things change, the more they stay the same, and in this case, it’s Philly who once again came up short at the most critical moment.

So where do the 76ers go from here? The answer to that is anyone’s guess, but here’s what we do know. Under the watch of head coach Doc Rivers, this is the third straight season the team has went out in the conference semifinals, and Embiid should no longer get a pass on the blame (that’s for the people who want to find other places point fingers). He and Harden have a detailed history of disappearing over and over again, and it’s apparent this current batch of players has reached the ceiling. Therefore, it’s probably time to see another shift in strategy for Philly, and judging off of Tuesday’s move to relieve Rivers from his head coaching duties, the 76ers agree with this settlement. Don’t be surprised is Harden is the next to leave. In fact, Embiid and guard Tyrese Maxey are probably the only ones who would probably be considered “untouchable,” and everyone else is for sale. I don’t know if this is still considered part of the “Trust The Process” era, but the time to end the whole thing has arrived, and is probably overdue.

Decision: Break It Up

Phoenix Suns

Before diving into the state of the Suns, lets give full disclosures. Phoenix was already on the way to a steep decline. Back in 2021, they had a 2-0 lead on the Milwaukee Bucks before losing four straight in the NBA Finals. When that occurred, the feeling that ran through my thought process was this group of Suns players would never have as good of a title opportunity as they had at that moment. Yes, Phoenix had the best regular season record in the league the next season, but imploded in a lifeless Game 7 loss at home to the Dallas Mavericks in the semifinals. With the team feeling desperate for a championship, the Suns decided to go all-in, trading with the Brooklyn Nets to acquire forward Kevin Durant. The result was a big four that added Durant to the trio of Devin Booker, Chris Paul and Deandre Ayton, but not much else behind that. The lack of depth and defense was exposed in their loss to the Denver Nuggets in this year’s conference semifinals. Yes, I know Paul was injured (which is the case most playoff runs), and Ayton missed Game 6, but there’s not much reason to believe that would have made a difference in the result.

The other disclosure is there’s an understanding Phoenix doesn’t have much choice but to Run It Back, because they’re pretty much stuck with what they have. There are no assets to trade, and not much money to bring free agents in. That doesn’t mean the Suns aren’t trying to change things, and the release of head coach Monty Williams verifies that. Whoever takes Williams’ place won’t have much to work with. Durant and Paul will be a year older, and they have already shown signs of gassing out during the playoffs. Maybe Ayton can start to show more signs of dominance, but it’s questionable where the hope of that happening is. This is my way of saying it’s probably better for Phoenix to tear down, but because of the top-end talent they do possess, they’ll believe they have a chance to bring a title to the desert.

Decision: Break It Up (but I know they’ll Run It Back)

Golden State Warriors

Out of the four teams being discussed, the Warriors are probably the hardest to dissect. Golden State has won four titles since Steve Kerr became the head coach before the 2014-15 season, with a core that includes Steph Curry, Klay Thompson and Draymond Green. After getting eliminated by the Los Angeles Lakers in six games, questions about the end of the dynasty are circulating around the NBA and sports media airwaves. While Curry, Thompson and Green have met the challenges and doubts more often than not, the signs of age and years worth of battles taking their toll stuck out like a sore thumb. All season, even through the Warriors’ struggles on the road, they got the benefit of the doubt because of their championship pedigree. The combination of the Lakers’ depth, and their own shots not falling, solidified Golden State’s first series loss against a Western Conference opponent in Kerr’s tenure.

It’s widely understood Curry is going nowhere, but the same can’t be said with as much certainty for Thompson and Green. The other splash brother has an expiring contract, and Green can opt out from his current deal this summer. Even the general manager, Bob Myers, might be on the way out. If Myers is gone, the person who takes over will have a monumental task to retool around Curry. A good place to start is the inside positions, because L.A.’s forward/center, Anthony Davis, destroyed Golden State in the paint. Many times before, the Warriors were able to overcome the lack of height with their pinpoint shooting from distance, but not this time. Even with all of the doubts and questions, I can’t help but believe Golden State will tune things up for one more run at a championship, with a lot of the same cast of characters.

Decision: Run It Back

Even with NBA Finals heartbreak, Tatum has arrived

Life for someone in the public spectrum has never been harsher than it is right now, particularly for someone playing sports at the highest levels. With the evolution of social media, action on the playing field never goes without instant praise or criticism. If a star player on the verge of reaching superstar status has a performance that ranks with some of the best ever seen, people are quick to say this is the “coming out party,” or the moment he or she can be mentioned with the best in the world. Once the performance is below the expectations set on the “superstar,” those same people who were so quick to elevate the player are just as quick to say they haven’t arrived yet. This is the reality Boston Celtics forward Jayson Tatum faces, as he and his team attempts to heal from losing in the NBA Finals to the Golden State Warriors.

When the Celtics can get past the disappointment stage, they can look at the season as a success, especially considering the team was meddling around .500 in January. A lot of growth occurred in Boston, and the same can be said for Tatum, who constantly heard he and fellow teammate Jaylen Brown couldn’t make it work as a duo. During the playoff run to the finals, Tatum had many moments of brilliance, showing why some people would say he’s the best in a crop of young players knocking on the door of ultimate success. When the Celtics got there, it’s no secret Tatum struggled to duplicate those classic performances. Therefore, the hot take artists and members of the social media toilets were ready to tear him down, as if those positive thoughts were never said. Stephen Curry, who won the NBA Finals MVP, went through periods of slander. So did Michael Jordan, LeBron James and Giannis Antetokounmpo (among other greats). The point is every player who makes meteoric rises to the top has to endure good and bad, and Tatum is no different.

To understand how quickly things can turn around on the praise or dump meter, it wasn’t too long ago when Tatum led the Celtics to a shocking (to some) sweep of the Brooklyn Nets in the first round. Fast forward to the conference semifinals, and Boston was down 3-2 to Antetokounmpo and the then-defending champion Milwaukee Bucks with Game 6 in Milwaukee. It was Tatum who scored 46 points to keep the Celtics’ season alive. Boston would go on to knock the Bucks out in Game 7 at home, and in another seventh game against the Miami Heat in the conference finals (also on the road) Tatum led the squad with 26 points and was named MVP of the series. There were many in the media who thought the Celtics would win the championship, and Tatum was on his way to being a bona fide, top-5 basketball player in the world. As we all know, Boston came up short, and guess who’s in the crosshairs for why they did.

Even with the subpar performance in the finals, what other player who is younger than 25-years-old would people rather have than Tatum? Luka Doncic? Ja Morant? Devin Booker? Trae Young? All of the players mentioned can score in spades, and scoring is the glamour stat in all sports. What puts Tatum over the top is his completeness as a player. Not only can he score with anyone in the league, he can affect the game in ways the others can not. Tatum is better on defense than any of the young players mentioned, and besides Booker (with the Phoenix Suns last season), the others haven’t been to the NBA Finals as of yet. It’s understood basketball is a team sport, but at the same time, there is more put on individual accolades than ever. So if we’re going to play that game, Tatum has the others beat in this regard.

While this is a society that judges people on the latest happenings, it’s important to consider the entire body of work. Could Tatum have played better in the finals? Of course. Could he have been more aggressive looking for his own offense at times? Absolutely, but to say Tatum is a disappointment is a bit harsh. All of the credit should go to Golden State’s defense for the struggles, but the willingness to take on double-teams and be a willing passer should not be overlooked when it comes overall growth. It can be easy to forget, but Tatum is only 24 years of age, and the Celtics have a young team around him that points to being competitive for years to come. Based off of the apparent rise during this year’s playoff run, Tatum has arrived, because only stars get the treatment in the public where they can shine, then fall flat before sustainability kicks in.

Egos in the way of perceived great players

When a player is going through his or her career, one of the toughest things for them to deal with is the realization they can’t quite do the stuff they could in their younger days. Knowing Father Time is undefeated, a tough decision has to be made. Either said player is going to evolve and make adjustments to prolong their journey, or the ego will stay in the way, leading to a sharp decline in ability and status. The three players discussed in the coming paragraphs are among the best offensive players in recent memory (notice I didn’t say overall, because they’re terrible defensively), but for one reason or another, the impact they once had on the court is becoming more minimal almost by the day. Therefore, it’s probably safe to say a crossroads has been reached, and what happens after this point depends on whether or not growth occurs.

Let’s start with Brooklyn Nets guard Kyrie Irving. One thing Irving can say is he has a championship on his resume, and by hitting one of the biggest shots in NBA history in Game 7 of the 2016 NBA Finals, he is forever written in Cleveland Cavaliers and NBA history. Outside of that, Irving is known for having special offensive skills, but also for being a player who is not dependable and rots team chemistry. He forced a trade from the Cavaliers to the Boston Celtics, and after two seasons, the Celtics couldn’t wait to get him out the door. The Nets were waiting to take Irving in, but the three seasons that have followed have been uneven at best. The 30-year-old has constantly alienated teammates, and between injuries, going on mysterious vacations during the season and his unwillingness to get the COVID vaccine, nobody can say he’s been the most available player. What’s common with Irving’s behavior is let him tell the story, it’s never his fault, and he always the smartest person in the room. Point blank, all of the drama that comes with Irving off the court is starting to overcome the dazzle his offensive talent provides on it, and if his ego continues to inflate, it would not be a surprise to hear about an early retirement sooner than later.

Next, let’s dive into the story of Philadelphia 76ers guard James Harden. The 32-year-old was once mentioned as one of the greatest offensive players in league history during his time with the Houston Rockets, and he even has a regular season MVP under his belt from the 2017-’18 campaign. Now, accumulating with a no-show performance in an elimination game Thursday night against the Miami Heat, Harden has developed a reputation to disappear when his team he’s on needs him the most (playoff time). Another cloud that hangs over his head is the tendency to want to run away from adverse times. When things went south in Houston, Harden threw teammates under the bus, showed up to training camp horribly out of shape, and whined his way to the aforementioned Nets via a trade involving four teams. Stuff went haywire in Brooklyn, and once again, Harden forced a trade, this time to the 76ers. One can only run away from problems for so long, before the problem is staring right back at them through a mirror. This is the reality Harden faces, and that, combined with declining abilities, is all catching up. It’s already proven a team wasn’t going to win a title with a player who has been on three teams in two years being their best, but maybe it can happen with him being a complimentary piece. Can Harden make that adjustment? Anything is possible, but if teams continue to pay him like a max player, there’s no reason to believe that change would happen.

Finally, the story of Los Angeles Lakers guard Russell Westbrook is on the menu. Like Harden, Westbrook has won an MVP (2016-’17), and he averaged a triple-double in three straight seasons (four total). When the triple-double record was reached in Westbrook’s award-winning journey as a member of the Oklahoma City Thunder, that marked the first time a player accomplished the feat since Oscar Robertson did it in 1961-’62. The 33-year-old has been widely praised for his ungodly athletic feats, but a game that’s heavily reliant on athleticism never ages well, especially if that player has little to fall back on. Westbrook has never been a good outside shooter, and even with the flashy triple-double numbers, he’s still a turnover machine after all of these years in the NBA. The athleticism goes away with age, and those explosive dunks are now missed layups. All of this equals being on four teams (Thunder, Rockets, Washington Wizards and Lakers) in the same amount of seasons. It’s no secret the Lakers had a disappointing, disastrous season with no games in the playoffs, but there might have been a slight chance if Westbrook put his ego to the side and came off the bench. With a team that has LeBron James on it, the opportunities to handle the ball go down significantly. Anyone who follows basketball knows that, but apparently, Westbrook didn’t get the memo.

To sum everything up, these three players have serious choices to make if they’re going to be the best version of themselves. In saying that, understand it’s not as much about the numbers as it is about the mindset coming onto the court. When a person thinks about Irving, Harden and Westbrook, leadership and unselfishness isn’t the first thing that comes to mind. This could have been the case all along, but it’s to the point the elite offensive glamour can no longer cover the messy truth. Now, the thirty somethings have to reinvent their way of thinking, or those inflated egos might find themselves in the midst of a huge freefall from grace.

The NBA title asterisk argument, and why it doesn’t make any sense

Here we are, in the middle of the 2021 NBA Finals, coming close to crowning a new champion. As it stands right now, the Milwaukee Bucks have a 3-2 series lead over the Phoenix Suns, with Game 6 scheduled for Tuesday night in Milwaukee. Both of these teams have been through a lot in their journey to the championship series, and whoever wins deserve the time to be celebrated. It’s been said nobody can ever take a title away from a team who wins it. Unfortunately, there are many who will try to take it away, or at the very least, attempt to lessen the legitimacy of the triumph. Regardless of who wins, either the Bucks or Suns will have to hear how (among other things) teams they faced along the way were not at full strength, which is basically saying their paths were made significantly easier. The 72-game regular season is also something that will be thrown in to dump dirt on the potential victory. All of this equals the mastery of the halfway acknowledgement, where you have people admitting the championship run happened, but with an asterisk. Words like phony and cheap are constantly thrown around to explain a team’s quest when it’s perceived they did not exactly “earn” it. Come with me as we look at other title runs that commonly have an asterisk by it, and then talk about why these cases against the winners equate to glorified excuse making.

1999 San Antonio Spurs – Going into this particular season, there was serious doubt a season would even take place. The NBA and the Players Association were in the middle of a lockout, and a deal wasn’t reached until January of that year. As a result, the season was shortened to 50 games, and the All-Star Game was cancelled. With the campaign compacted, it was the Spurs, lead by future hall-of-famers Tim Duncan and David Robinson, who would emerge as the team to unseat the Chicago Bulls as the new heirs to the throne. Of course, the Bulls looked totally different from previous years, as Michael Jordan, Scottie Pippen and Dennis Rodman all left the team, and the Los Angeles Lakers, with young superstars Shaquille O’Neal and Kobe Bryant, weren’t quite ready to ascend to the throne just yet. To top it off, the Spurs defeated an eighth-seeded New York Knicks team to win the franchise’s first trophy. Bottom line is whoever won the title in this campaign was going to get grief simply because it wasn’t the normal 82-game format. It just happened to be the Spurs. Being a teenager who was growing up in San Antonio at that time, I can say first hand the fans down there didn’t care about the way victory was claimed by their team.

2012 Miami Heat – Like the ’99 season, the 2011-12 was also shortened by a work stoppage. The difference is the powers that be were able to salvage a 66-game season instead of 50, with the games starting Christmas Day. The Heat, with the “Big 3” of LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh, were coming off of a crushing loss to the Dallas Mavericks in the 2011 Finals. With everything on the line, they were able to come through and get the elusive title James sought after in coming down to Florida from the Cleveland Cavaliers in the summer of 2010. Having said that, the championship didn’t come without its doubts. Besides the season being 66 games, people wonder to this day whether or not the Heat even get to the Finals if the Bulls, who had the best record in the Eastern Conference that year, didn’t lose point guard Derrick Rose to a injured knee in the first round of the playoffs. In the conference finals, Miami needed all seven teams to get by a Boston Celtics team that had Kevin Garnett, Paul Pierce and Ray Allen all on the downsides of their respective careers. With the team the Heat had, it was not a huge surprise seeing them win, but for the haters out there, these are the excuses they put in front to justify the asterisk.

2015 Golden State Warriors – Unlike the first two case studies, the Warriors actually played a full 82-game season. They also had the league’s best record at 67-15 and the Most Valuable Player in guard Stephen Curry. On the surface, this is the team that should have won it all with all things considered, but the argument comes against them because of their opponent in the NBA Finals, the Cavaliers. It was the first year in James’ return to Cleveland after being in Miami for the last four seasons, and he had another version of the Big 3 in the form of himself, guard Kyrie Irving and forward Kevin Love. On the way through the East, Love suffered an injured shoulder and was lost for the rest of the season, and Irving hurt his knee in Game 1 of the Finals. Now here come the questions. What would the result have been if Cleveland was healthy (One can ask the same question in reverse when it comes to the Cavs’ title win the year after)? It’s always tough because injuries are part of sports, and we never know when, where or who they can happen to. It’s probably fair to say it’s often not the best team who rises to the top, but the healthiest. For LeBron (and the few remaining Cavs) fans everywhere, health will always be a question, but isn’t that the case for many teams in the history of sports?

2019 Toronto Raptors – In a time where we are always looking a story to captivate us, this version of the Raptors was one a person can get behind with ease. Forward Kawhi Leonard was traded to Toronto from the Spurs before the year started, and with that move, the whole country of Canada was being carried on Leonard’s back. The end saw the Raptors winning the title, defeating the Warriors, who were trying to become the first team since the Lakers in the early 2000s to win three straight league championships, 4-2. With this run, there are two glaring points some fans and media will point out to take away from Toronto’s accomplishment. One, James left the Eastern Conference to sign with the Lakers, and teams that had him playing for them had made the Finals eight straight times. Two, the Warriors saw Kevin Durant and Klay Thompson go down to catastrophic injuries. Yes, Golden State was favored to win it all going into the season, but to say they would have won just off of projections ignore the original reason why games are played. It just goes to show why there is an element of luck, good or bad, that goes with the skill, and for the people in the city of Toronto, I struggle to see any evidence of care about how the Raptors brought a title back to not just that metropolitan area, but the country as a whole.

2020 Lakers – I probably don’t have to explain why this case is questioned, but for research purposes, here it goes. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the season, and sports in general, stopped as we know it, and there were questions about the season being canceled altogether. From March 11 to July 30, the season was in limbo, but it did return to resume playing in Orlando, where teams met to play in the NBA bubble. Needless to say, the circumstances the players were facing were unlike any they have faced before. So with that being said, mental and emotional toughness was going to be key for the team that could rise to the top. It ended up being the Lakers, but people would be quick to point out how the “break” really helped James and newly-acquired forward Anthony Davis by helping their bodies recover from the grind of the regular season. Davis has a detailed injury history, and James, as great as he is, was showing signs of the wear and tear of a long career that has seen countless runs to the Finals in previous years. In other words, critics say L.A. would not have won the title if it wasn’t for the pause in action.

So there are five cases detailing why some fans and media want to put an asterisk on these title runs, but to be honest, the people who have these opinions sound dumb and jealous. If their favorite team, or in the case of the media, their pick to win, came through for them, they are not complaining or talking about the perceived pitfalls they want to throw on the winners. They would put a more positive spin on it, saying how their team was tenacious and showed the heart and grit necessary to complete such a task. Also, it’s quickly forgotten all of the other squads had the same circumstances to deal with. It’s not like there was a different set of rules put together for the team that hoisted the Larry O’Brien trophy. To sum it up, the asterisk argument holds no water with these scenarios, and it won’t when the Bucks or Suns get their moment to shine sometime this week. That does not mean people won’t try to fill the broken cup with BS. We’re just left to decide if we want to take the cup, and that decision should be easy if things are looked at by principle instead of who is involved.

Lots of questions await the Heat after abrupt end to season

In the world of sports, there is one thing we can be sure of, no matter what the situation is. We know only one team (or individual, depending on the sport) is going to end their season or competition with a victory, and that’s the champion. Everyone else is going to end with a loss, and with that comes questions regarding what direction to go in for the future. As of this past Saturday, the Miami Heat get an early start to address these questions after getting swept out of the NBA playoffs by a cold front known as the Milwaukee Bucks. We all know the last year and a half has been unlike anything most of us have ever dealt with, but it’s still jarring to see a team who was in the NBA Finals a few months ago get eliminated in the first round without much of a fight. Let’s dive into a few of these circumstances as to why we are at this point with the Heat, and explore where they might go from this point forward.

As I mentioned in the first paragraph, Miami was in the finals literally a few months ago. The Heat, along with the eventual champion Los Angeles Lakers, ended the season on October 11. Normally, and NBA season would end around mid-June, but because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the season was halted March 11, 2020, and didn’t restart until late-July. It’s an understatement to say the pandemic presented daunting and unique challenges for everyone, and the NBA was no different. Through it all, a bubble in Orlando was created to resume the season and keep the players safe, and some teams handled it better than others (to put it bluntly). The Heat were obviously one of the teams who handled it well, to the point where some (myself included), wondered if they would make this run if it was a normal season. Miami was the fifth seed in the Eastern Conference going into last season’s playoffs, and while they had a good team, I would be hard-pressed to find many who felt they would be the team to represent the East in the finals. Be as it may, the Heat became the conference champs, and had to be back on the court in short order, as this current season began before Christmas. Simply put, the offseason really wasn’t much of one for the squad, but how much of a factor that was in seeing Miami fall far short of last season’s results is anyone’s guess.

One of the biggest reasons why the Heat ascended to the NBA Finals last season was the play and leadership of forward Jimmy Butler. In my estimation, I always thought of Butler as a very good player overall, but just short of elite because I never looked at him as a man who could elevate a team to championship-level status. In the bubble, one could make an argument Butler was the best player in the league during that period of time, averaging 21.2 points, 6.5 rebounds and 5.8 assists per game. He, along with head coach Erik Spoelstra, was a calming influence for a team with a lot of young players, such as Bam Adebayo, Duncan Robinson and Tyler Herro. With this core primarily intact coming into this season, there were some who thought the Heat could duplicate what happened in the bubble, while others were wondering if it was just the team being the equivalent of an overnight success story. I was in the camp of those thinking it was a flash in a pan, but I have been wrong before, so I had to wait and see along with everyone else.

In the midst of a shortened 72-game season (a normal NBA season is 82 games), the campaign was going a lot like it was for Miami last season before the stoppage of play. The talent was in place, and it was taking a while to mold it together, but it was starting to take shape. By the time the playoffs started, the vision was the Heat would be ready to roll. Add the addition of Victor Oladipo, who was acquired in a trade with the Houston Rockets before the deadline, and Miami was sure to have a team no one would want to see come playoff time. We would come to find out none of the hopes and dreams of the team would play out to a positive outcome. Oladipo would miss the rest of the season with a quadriceps injury, which also sidelined him in 2019 as a member of the Indiana Pacers, and the rest of the Heat ran into a motivated Bucks team they knocked out of the conference semifinals last season. The magic and energy they were able to capture in the bubble wasn’t there to be found, but it wasn’t as much about the lack of magic as it was about Milwaukee being much better than Miami was. With the exception of Game 1, won by the Bucks by two in overtime, the series was every bit the sweep the scoreboard shows, with Milwaukee winning games 2, 3 and 4 by a combined 80 points. To say the least, this was an embarrassing and humbling way for the Heat to go out after such promise, but I don’t know if even the best teams would have had much of a chance if the Bucks are going to play like that.

So here we are, with Miami left to answer a lot of questions about their present and future. While I’m not in the Heat front office (or anyone significant…haha). I can give my input for answers as much as I can looking from the outside. Was Miami just a bubble sensation? It looks that way, but that doesn’t mean credit should be taken away from their run to the Finals last season, especially since the rest of the teams were dealing with the same environment. Is Butler an elite player? I would say he has moments where he can achieve that status, but not consistently enough to where I put him in that class. If the answer to the last question is indeed no, then who can the Heat get to pair up with Butler? Most of the teams who are championship contenders have two star players, if not three, on their roster. It remains to be seen if Adebayo is that second star. After getting a max extension in November, it’s hard to say much progress has been made. Can Oladipo recover from his injury troubles? That’s a wait and see answer also. I say all of this to point out Miami has to mainly work with what they have, because there isn’t much they can do with their current situation. In other words, the bubble could be the ceiling for the Heat, and I don’t think that’s a hot take considering how much the East is improving around them.